Green Tip: Avoid DBP, Toluene and Formaldehyde in Nail Polish

I saw this green tip today on the Daily Green, which is timely because I am getting my nails done today (I rarely get my nails done but am trying a new place that’s supposed to carry vegan nail polish!).

Many popular nail polishes contain the so-called “toxic trio” of chemicals (though you won’t always find them listed among the ingredients): dibutyl phthalate (DBP), toluene and formaldehyde.

A number of companies now offer natural nail polishes that are gorgeous and fun, as well as safer for you and the planet.

Examples include the soy- and corn-based Priti ($10.50-$12.25 at amazon.com or $16 at gaiam.com) and the water-based Suncoat ($10 at amazon.com), which hydrates the underlying nail and is available in 32 colors. Bright polishes from ToeShades require no remover to take off: They simply peel away.

You may not have realized it, but your nails are porous and can allow toxins to enter your bloodstream. So why not play it safe and pick a great new “natural” color?

 

It seems like OPI, which is a common nail polish, doesn’t usually contain this trio.  Here’s some more info on other brands as well.

 

 

 

Cap Metro Considers Fare Increase, Which if it Affects me, will Result in me Riding the Bus Less

I’ve been MIA for quite some time, first with being pretty busy with family visiting, and then getting hacked (!) last week. I think the website problems are cleared up (thanks Berto!), so hopefully it will be smooth sailing from here on out!

Anyway, I saw this article in the Statesman about a possible fare increase:

Capital Metro fares, last raised in 2010 after being static for much of the agency’s first quarter-century, could be headed up again.

A consultant hired by the transit agency to study fares, including how they compare with those in other comparable cities, recommended Monday that Capital Metro in January increase its weekly and monthly pass prices by 10 to 20 percent, and begin charging $2.75 for all MetroRail trips.

The commuter rail line currently has a zoned system, with riders who make relatively short, one-zone trips paying $1 a ride and those traveling farther paying $2.75 one-way.

“Capital Metro is not a distance-based system,” consultant Nancy Edmonson told the Capital Metro board. “There’s evidence of a lot of abuse of this.”

Edmonson, among several other suggestions, also recommended that Capital Metro in January 2015 raise its base bus fare from $1 a trip to $1.25, and in 2014 create a one-way fare of $1.50 for the agency’s new MetroRapid bus routes and existing “flyer” routes to the airport and Oak Hill.

The agency board is expected to consider the recommendations this summer and, if it accepts any of them, take that action as part of approving the agency’s 2013-14 budget in September. The first of the fare increases would not occur until January.

Board member John Langmore said he is “generally in agreement with most of her recommendations,” but said that public reaction and policy considerations other than maximizing revenue will be a part of the equation in the coming months.

“You can bet that it won’t get implemented on a wholesale basis,” Langmore said.

Making all of the recommended changes would raise about $4 million a year, Edmonson estimated, less than 2 percent of Capital Metro’s operating and capital budget of $274.5 million this year. But only about $18 million of the agency’s revenue comes from fares — Capital Metro’s 1 percent sales tax and federal grants cover most of the agency’s costs — so the changes would increase fare revenue by more than 20 percent.

And Capital Metro’s “fare recovery” — the percentage of its operating costs supported by fare revenue — would increase from about 12 percent to 14 percent, Edmonson said.

This would be the third fare increase since October 2008, but still would leave Capital Metro fares and the agency’s fare recovery percentage well below most of its transit industry peers, according to Edmonson.

Until 2008, Capital Metro’s base, one-way fare had been 50 cents since the agency’s inception in 1985, with the exception of a one-year period in 1989 and 1990 when the board did away with fares. The agency’s sales tax historically had generated millions more annually than was needed to run the bus system.

But as the agency built MetroRail in the middle of the past decade and made other high-dollar investments in park-and-ride lots and other facilities, the sales tax was no longer able to bear all the freight. The board also raised fares in January 2010, bringing the base bus fare to its current $1.

Ridership dipped after both the 2008 and 2010 fare increases, although other factors such as the recession and a strike may have contributed to those slumps. Edmonson said the general rule of thumb is that transit ridership tends to drop, at least for awhile, about 2.5 percent for every 10 percent increase in fares.

But it still could be the right thing to do, Langmore said.

“We can’t sit wherever we’re at for fear of losing ridership,” he said. “We have to move toward a more sustainable fare policy.”

Selfishly, I read this article and thought “good, it doesn’t affect the express bus (which I ride and currently costs $64 a month).”  Then I dug deeper… and realized the Statesman article is somewhat incomplete and that under this Cap Metro consultant’s proposal, the express buss pass would go up to $77 a month in 2014, and then $96.25 in 2015!

Fare_Infographic

from http://www.capmetro.org/news-item.aspx?id=2221

In a given work month, I typically will ride the bus 21 days at most, so I am paying about $3.04 per day to ride the bus (64/21=3.04), which I think is a decent deal (it would cost me about $3.25ish to drive my own car to work per day, based on current gas prices). Overall though, I would prefer to just drive myself in rather than take the bus were it not for trying to be green.  Driving myself takes less time, I have more control over what errands I can do on the way home from work, I like the independence, and I don’t have to stand in the 100 degree heat waiting for a bus. Taking the bus is nice because I do enjoy the time I get to read on the bus and it’s less stressful (usually) to let someone else do the driving and saves a few pennies a day, but overall I’m mostly motivated to ride the bus for environmental reasons.  But for $77 a month I would be paying $3.67 a day to ride the bus,  and if it cost $96.25 for a monthly bus pass, it would be  $4.59 a day.  That’s ridiculous!  Maybe if gas prices go up a lot it would make more sense to me, but at current prices, I’m more inclined to just buy a more gas efficient car and not take the bus.  I’ll be interested to see what my bus companions think about this possible increase….

Another New Study on Austin’s Traffic Problems

The Statesman has this story today about a new study that says Austin has the 4th worst traffic in the nation:

NRIX, a Kirkland, Wa., company that collects real-time traffic data from more than 100 million vehicles worldwide using global positioning devices, rates Austin traffic as the fourth worst in the United States. And the company’s recently released 2012-13 report indicates that traffic here bucked a national and international trend last year and got worse.

Austin traffic congestion increased 3 percent in 2012, compared to 2011, INRIX says, even as congestion fell 22 percent in North America and 18 percent in Europe. And for the first three months of 2013, congestion in Austin increased another 8 percent versus that same time period in 2012.

The average delay at rush hour here, INRIX said, is about 22 percent compared to a similar trip taken in free flowing traffic. The national average is 6.6 percent.

The typical Austin-area commuter spent 38 hours caught in traffic congestion in 2012, the report says, right at the national average. Austin is at that average, despite having worse traffic congestion than all but Los Angeles, Honolulu and San Francisco, because the average commuting distance here is still considerably less than in most larger U.S. metro areas.

Austin Bike Sharing Program Delayed

KUT had this story about a delay in implementing a bike-sharing program in Austin.  Here’s an excerpt:

Annick Beaudet of the Public Works department tells KUT News that the program has seen “complications,” and that a launch planned for this spring– which would’ve been ideal, seeing as May is National Bike Month – will be indefinitely delayed.

Austin’s Public Works Department has been gearing up Austin’s bike-share program since a positive vote from City Council in January, but there has been little progress on the measure as of late.

Beaudet said that her department is looking for potential candidates to facilitate the program that would reportedly feature 40 bike stations across town and 400 bikes to rent. Beaudet could not comment on any possible candidates for the contracts, or give details as to when the program will be up and running other than “some time this year.”

 

I recently was in San Antonio with my family and tried out the B-Cycle, which I hope to write about more in a future post.  It was convenient, although it had some drawbacks, but overall, I would love to see something similar in Austin.

Photo credit: https://twitter.com/SA_Bcycle

 

Map Shows Many Austinites Bike to Work, Just Don’t Feel Safe

credit City of Austin

May is bike to work month (Friday is bike to work day!) so this KUT article is timely:

It’s no secret that Austin is a biking city. And while cities around the country are gearing up for National Bike to Work Day, riding to work is nothing new for Austinites: according to Census data, people here commute by bike four times more often than the national average.

To prove it, the city released a map breaking down bike commuting by neighborhood. But while more people are pedaling to work, cyclists don’t always feel safe on Austin roads.

 

KUT news intern, Austin Feldman regularly commutes from his home in West Campus to work on his bike. It’s just a few blocks.

But he’d ride everyplace – if he felt safe.

“I feel that what [Austin] lacks isn’t even infrastructure,” Feldman said. “It happens to be education between motorists and bicyclists to know the rules of the road and [how] to best navigate the city in tandem.” He’s not alone.

“We all hear stories of these people being hit from behind,”  said Jack Sanford, a program manager at Bike Texas, a statewide nonprofit bike advocacy and education group. “If we can separate cars from bikes and have everyone in their own travel lanes based by speed…more people would commute.”

“I would like to see more of what the city is already doing, which is much more than striping,” said Sanford. “We all know paint on the street isn’t going to protect a cyclist from a distracted driver. But what Austin is doing … is protected bike lanes. These protected lanes are the way of the future to get people on bikes.”

Although the U.S. Census shows that just two percent of Austinites ride their bikes to or from work, that seemingly low number is deceptive.

“Two percent… is actually a pretty big number for cities in the U.S.,” said Sanford. “The fact that census data is showing that Austin is hitting 2 percent is huge … It shows how much great work people in Austin have done to make it a great city for biking and walking.”

There are many reasons why people choose to bike to work. Some of the most common include saving money on gas, protecting the environment and getting exercise.

“[I bike to work] because it saves me money in gas and parking,” said Monica Herrera, a local biker. “[But] there are not enough bike lanes and some of them need to be improved because they are barely visible.”

Rand Cutter also bikes to work, but she sees things a little differently. Cutter thinks the bike lanes are “fantastic,” but “there are too few bike racks on campus and at other destinations… [and] employers should offer incentives or organized “bike carpools” for employees.”

“Safety is always the number one priority,” said Annick Beaudet, a program manager with the City of Austin Public Works Department. “Secondly we look at congestion management, which … would be  focusing priorities on areas where we know there’s a lot of short trips under three miles being made on our arterial network. And those are trips that realistically could be substituted by a bicycle.”

Beaudet called that “the sweet spot” for turning motorists into bicyclists. She said the city wants to focus on safety, accommodations and other “urban ills” that can be cured by more bicycling.

“Not only through [lessening] congestion but also through the cumulative effects that more active living can have on our quality of life in Austin – the cost of healthcare, transportation and housing,” Beaudet said. “All of those things start to be cured a bit by using a bike more for transportation.”

Save on Energy Efficient Appliances Memorial Day Weekend

Memorial Day weekend is a great time to look at replacing old appliances because local and state sales taxes are waived during this time period for certain energy star appliances.   Here’s more info:

 

During Memorial Day weekend, Texas shoppers get a break from state and local sales and use taxes on purchases of certain energy efficient products.

The 2013 ENERGY STAR sales tax holiday begins at 12:01 a.m. (after midnight) on Saturday, May 25, and ends at 11:59 p.m. on Monday, May 27 (Memorial Day).

The products qualifying for the exemption are:

  • Air conditioners priced at $6,000 or less
  • Refrigerators priced at $2,000 or less
  • Ceiling fans
  • Incandescent and fluorescent light bulbs
  • Clothes washers*
  • Dishwashers
  • Dehumidifiers
  • Programmable thermostats**

* Because most dryers use similar amounts of energy, ENERGY STAR does not label clothes dryers.

** ENERGY STAR specification of programmable thermostats was suspended on December 31, 2009; however, any existing stock of ENERGY STAR labeled programmable thermostats offered for sale by retailers is still eligible for the exemption.

Check out all the info here!

Don’t Eat Certain Fish From the Gulf According to Texas Officials

Because of concerns about mercury, Texas officials are warning people to avoid eating certain fish.  I didn’t realize I needed to worry about some of these kinds! According to the Statesman:

State health officials have raised mercury concerns in advising some people not to eat or to limit consumption of certain fish caught off the Texas coast.

The Department of State Health Services issued the advisory Tuesday. Experts say too much mercury can harm the central nervous system.

Some fish caught in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico had mercury at concentrations that exceed Texas health guidelines. The advisory involves shark, blackfin tuna, blue marlin, little tunny, crevalle jack, king mackerel, swordfish and wahoo.

DSHS says women of childbearing age and youngsters under age 12 shouldn’t eat those fish. The advisory recommends older women and men limit consumption of such fish to no more than one or two meals monthly.

Mercury occurs naturally but can also be a byproduct of human activity.

Good to know!

Texas Tribune Article: “Bill Would End TCEQ Compliance History Program”

Don’t know if this bill will pass, but hopefully not.  Here’s the story  from the Texas Tribune:

A program that gives the public information — albeit limited — about the compliance history of facilities overseen by the state’s main environmental agency would end under a bill House lawmakers will consider this week. In the aftermath of the deadly fertilizer plant explosion in the town of West, environmental groups say the measure is a mistake.

State Rep. Wayne Smith‘s House Bill 1714, which is scheduled for a preliminary vote in the House on Wednesday, would discontinue the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s so-called compliance history program, which rates every owner or operator of a facility regulated by the state’s water quality, solid waste disposal, radiation control and clean air rules, among others.

Critics of the program, which generates a report card of sorts, say it has “limited usefulness and marginal practical benefit and places a laborious and financial burden on TCEQ,” according to the measure’s bill analysis. The bill was voted out of committee April 9, eight days before the fertilizer plant explosion devastated West, but it wasn’t set on the House calendar until Monday night.

The bill “decides that compliance history is not bringing one more drop of cleaner water, one more breath of fresher air, one more spoonful of cleaner dirt,” Smith said when he first laid out the bill in March, adding that it lumps facilities ranging from dry cleaners to wastewater treatment plants into the same category. “I just don’t think it’s necessary anymore.”

In the House on Tuesday, Smith said that the public would continue to have input through TCEQ’s regular review process; his bill just does away with the scoring system. He said he doesn’t know that such a scoring system “would have made any difference” in the West explosion.

Environmental groups acknowledge that the existing program has not been particularly useful, which is why there wasn’t a major outcry as the bill worked its way through committee. “A very small percentage of businesses get a bad score under this program — something like 3 percent,” said David Weinberg, executive director of the Texas League of Conservation Voters.

But they say in the aftermath of the West explosion, lawmakers should be working to beef up the program and make it more meaningful, as opposed to discontinuing it.

“Given what happened there, and despite the possible shortcomings of the program,” Weinberg added, “now would be a very poor time to be taking away a tool that citizens have to find some information on whether facilities in their communities have good compliance history records.”

New Website Helps You Find an Experienced Bicycle Commuter Buddy

The City of Austin has a new website according to KUT:

A new website supported by the City of Austin’s Public Works Department aims to connect experience bicycle commuters with those who want to give it a try.

The “Bike Buddy” website features an interactive map to help cyclists find others who are biking in the same area as they are.

“Many Austin commuters are interested in cycling, but concerned about the safety of riding to work,” Council Member Riley says in a press release. “We also have many experienced bike commuters who are ready to help others discover how safe and enjoyable riding to work can be. This website offers a bridge between those two groups, enabling anyone to feel more comfortable by riding in with an experienced commuter who can suggest good routes, address questions about equipment and clothing needed, and provide guidance about the rules of the road.”

May is Bike Month. Here’s more about other biking events.

Sounds like a cool idea!

 

Take Old Clothes to Donate at H&M and Get a Discount

I’m sure most of us have heard the news of the recent tragedy in Bangladesh, and have realized that most (98%) of clothes sold in the U.S. are made overseas, much of that from Bangladesh where labor costs are low.  I’m trying to be more mindful of where I buy my clothes and where those clothes are made in light of this tragedy,  but with not many American companies in the market to support, limited knowledge about safety standards in other countries, and a limited clothing budget, I’ll probably still end up inadvertently supporting poor worker conditions if I buy any new clothes this summer (which I probably will do).  The best option, balancing my budgetary concerns and environmental concerns, would be to shop more 2nd hand items, going to stores like Goodwill and Buffalo Exchange.  The problem with that is that I end up needing more time to shop, since it takes longer at a 2nd hand store to find something that will fit and that I like.  And while I have found several cute and causal dresses from Buffalo Exchange that are appropriate for the weekend, finding business casual pieces (fitted dresses or suits) that are appropriate for work at a 2nd hand store has been a lot more challenging for me.

With that said, one of my favorite stores  that has reasonably priced petite options that are appropriate for work is H&M (a branch opened at the Domain in the fall).  Given that, I was happy to learn that you can bring in a bag of used clothes to H&M, which they will then either re-sell worldwide, convert to other products (like cleaning rags) or recycle into things like insulation.  In return, you can get a discount (usually 15% from what I’ve read online) on your next purchase.  So while I’m not advocating we all go out and go crazy buying up H&M’s products, I feel slightly better knowing that if I need something new for work this summer, at least I can somewhat justify it in my mind that they are supporting this re-wear, reuse, and recycle program that seems pretty progressive compared to the non-existent re-wear, reuse, and recycle programs are other similar stores.  Here’s where you can find more info on it.

“A Fierce Green Fire” Showing May 28 at the AMC Barton Creek Theater

I saw that “A Fierce Green Fire” is scheduled to be played on May 28 in Austin, so long as enough people buy tickets ahead of time (they need to sell 87 seats by May 21 to confirm the screening).  I am excited about the movie and will get tickets once I make sure I’m free that night.  It’s a Sundance film and is narrated by Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, and Ashley Judd, and is a history environmental movements over the last 50 years.  The trailer looks really good.  Here’s some more info about it:

Spanning 50 years of grassroots and global activism, this Sundance documentary brings to light the vital stories of the environmental movement where people fought – and succeeded – against enormous odds. From halting dams in the Grand Canyon to fighting toxic waste at Love Canal; from Greenpeace to Chico Mendes; from climate change to the promise of transforming our civilization, A Fierce Green Fire is “nothing less than the history of environmentalism itself.” (Los Angeles Times) From the Academy Award-nominated director of Berkeley in the Sixties, and narrated by Robert Redford, Meryl Streep, Ashley Judd, Van Jones and Isabel Allende. For more information about the film, resources, and existing screenings check out the film’s website here: http://www.afiercegreenfire.com.html.

 

6400619a828653373227c72cedda25d2

Get more info here!

CleanTX Forum: Renewables in Texas Tomorrow Night

I saw on Austin 360 a post about this event.  The cost to attend is $10-25 but it looks like a good panel:

Join CleanTX for a panel discussion between experts and leaders in Texas’ electric industry to address the realities of our evolving electric market, specifically regarding the decline of coal and the increased use of natural gas and renewable energy technologies. The context for the conversation is the Electric Reliability Council of Texas’s (ERCOT) Long Term System Assessment.
In January 2013, the Electric Reliability Council of Texas’s (ERCOT) released their Long Term System Assessment, a biennial report submitted to the Texas Legislature on “the need for increased transmission and generation capacity throughout the state of Texas.” ERCOT found that if you use updated wind and solar power characteristics to reflect changes in the technology over the past several years, wind and solar are more competitive than natural gas over the next 20 years.
As state leaders look for ways to encourage new capacity in the midst of a drought, it’s important to consider that renewable energy may be competitive over the long term with conventional resources. The fact that renewable energy resources can reduce our water dependency while hedging against higher long-term prices means that however state leaders decide to address the energy crunch, renewables need to be part of the discussion.
The panel discussion will be preceded with a networking event with food and drink provided.
Moderator: Roger Duncan, former General Manager, Austin Energy
Panelists: Trip Doggett, CEO, ERCOT
Eddie Rodriguez, Texas House of Representatives
Colin Meehan, Clean Energy Analyst, Environmental Defense Fund
Shalini Ramanathan, VP of Development, RES-Americas
About the CleanTX Forum
The CleanTX Forum is an educational panel discussion series that brings the clean energy community together to hear about important initiatives, policies and ideas. CleanTX Forums offer a venue for the community to network before hearing from industry and policy leaders on what is setting the agenda for economic and environmental solutions and clean technology innovation.

Here’s some more info.

All Restaurants Will Need to Compost Scraps by 2017

The Statesman has this article with all the details about new restaurant requirements going into effect in 2016:

Austin restaurants and other food businesses will have to compost food scraps starting in 2016, under new rules the City Council OK’d Thursday.

Food service businesses — including fast-food chains, caterers, cafeterias and bars — that are bigger than 5,000 square feet will be required to separate out organic and compostable materials from other trash and have them picked up by private haulers.

Smaller food businesses will have to comply starting in 2017.

Food trailers will be exempt for now, because the city needs to spend more time developing rules unique to them, said Bob Gedert, director of Austin Resource Recovery, the city of Austin’s trash and recycling department.

Under the rules passed Thursday, large food service businesses also will have to recycle several materials, including paper, plastics and aluminum, starting next year. Smaller food businesses will have to comply later.

The new rules aim to help the city meet its so-called zero waste goal of dramatically reducing the trash sent to landfills by 2040, Gedert said.

Food scraps and other compostable goods make up 40 to 50 percent of the trash that restaurants generate, Gedert said. Keeping those goods out of the landfill will go a long way toward achieving zero waste, Gedert said.

The policy passed Thursday builds on rules that the city enacted last fall, when it began requiring large apartment properties and office buildings to recycle more materials.

City crews will not collect the compostable goods; restaurants will have to hire companies to do that, Gedert said. Currently only a handful of Austin companies offer compost collection services.

Jeff Paine said his Austin company Break it Down collects compostables from about 100 smaller Austin restaurants and food businesses. Rates vary, but run about $40 to $60 a month, he said.

Most restaurants can adapt by swapping out trash bins with compost containers near food-prep tables, he said.

A hurdle that large restaurants often face is finding extra space outside for large compost and recycling containers in addition to Dumpsters. “If you have to give up a parking space for that, you’re losing revenue,” Paine said.

Don “Skeeter” Miller, co-owner of County Line restaurants and president of the Greater Austin Restaurant Association, said the membership was initially skeptical of the compost rules but is now mostly supportive, mainly because the rules won’t take effect for a few years.

County Line on the Lake took part in a city pilot program for compost collection at restaurants. The biggest problem was a limited number of companies to haul compostables, which drove up the rates, Miller said.

Had the months-long program lasted a full year, County Line on the Lake would have paid an extra $6,000 to $7,000 for collection and pickup of compost materials. It also spent $4,500 or so on extra containers, employee training and expansion of the trash bin area to accommodate a composting bin, Miller said.

More competition may drive the prices down until composting costs little more than throwing those items into the trash, Miller said.

“The kids at my restaurant, they’re into it. The customers don’t throw stuff into the right container right now,” Miller said. “But we know that’s going to change, and want to do it the right way. If we get to 2016 and we’re still at the same place (with a dearth of haulers), I want a trigger that says, ‘we’re still not where we need to be.’”

Patrick Terry, owner of the P. Terry’s burger chain, said he’s not familiar with the details of the new rules, but is generally supportive.

“Costs are always a concern, and this will probably affect restaurants with large menus more than us,” Terry said. “If we’ve got a few years to work it out, I’m in favor.”

The city of Austin started a pilot program last year to collect compostable goods from 7,000 Austin homes. It hopes to expand that program citywide in the future, Gedert said.

Free Keep Austin Beautiful Summer Camp

I saw this in my weekly Keep Austin Beautiful newsletter, and thought it might be a fun summer activity for kids:

 

Parents and other youth group leaders join your 9- to 13-year-old for a week of adventure exploring Austin’s creeks and aquifer! Families or groups with adult leaders are invited to participate in Clean Creek Camp during June and July. Camp is free with a $40.00 refundable deposit – reimbursed after attending the full session. Register early to confirm your participation. Visit the Clean Creek Camp webpage for more information and to register, or call Sara Heilman at 974-3540.

Clean Creek Camp is a partnership program of Keep Austin Beautiful and the City of Austin Watershed Protection Department.

 

It sounds like you basically have to be able to attend with your kids or have them attend with another adult chaperon, but if you can manage that, it sounds like a neat low-cost program that teaches kids a little about the environment.

Get Free Paint from Austin Resource Recovery for Your Home

Have you ever tried getting free Austin ReBlend paint for your home?  Even if you don’t love the colors available,  it would be great for a garage, laundry room, or office.  Here’s some more info:

Austin ReBlend is a 100 percent post-consumer, reblended flat paint (with low VOCs) made from paint collected at the Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) facility.

Free, High Quality Paint

Residents looking to save money when refurbishing their homes now have a freeresource – Austin Resource Recovery’s Austin ReBlend paint!

Austin ReBlend is available in five gallon containers and in two colors:

  • Texas Limestone (beige)
  • Balcones Canyonland (dark beige)

Pick up Austin ReBlend at the City of Austin Household Hazardous Waste Facilityduring regular hours of operation. Austin ReBlend is available for residential and nonprofit use at no charge. Currently this paint is not available for commercial use.

Making Austin ReBlend

Paint dropped off by customers is inspected before it is chosen to be used in Austin ReBlend. It is then consolidated, blended, filtered and packed by trained personnel to ensure a quality product.

Austin ReBlend is a Sustainable Choice

  • Helps keep paint out of landfills
  • Conserves water used to make new paint
  • Prevents pollution from the mining and extraction of raw materials
  • Moves Austin further toward its zero waste goal

Paint Storage Tips

  • Securely seal the lid and store in a dry location; small amounts of paint can be stored in any airtight container
  • Label paint so you can color match if needed

How to Dispose of Unused Paint

Do not put liquid paint in the trash, down the drain or on the ground. This can be harmful to the environment. Learn more about how to properly dispose of paint.

Purchase only what you need

Up to 70 percent of what the HHW receives each year is unused paint. Buying the right amount of paint saves you money, eliminates the need for storage and saves resources. Download the paint quantity chart to determine how many gallons of paint you need for your painting project.

City Wide Clean-Up April 13

April 13 is the annual city wide clean up with Keep Austin Beautiful.  I’ll be there!  Here’s some more info:

CITY-WIDE CLEANUP
Saturday, April 13th  |  9:00 AM – 11:00 AM
Locations all over Austin
SITE AND LEADER REGISTRATION - Register to lead a cleanup at your favorite neighborhood, school, creek, or park!
GENERAL VOLUNTEER REGISTRATION -  Register to be a Clean Sweep volunteer, and learn about our different volunteer opportunities both before and during the event.
  • Volunteer to cleanup a location of your choice
  • Join a supply packing party on April 8th and 9th. Snacks will be provided.
  • Help distribute supplies to our site leaders on April 10th and 11th. Snacks will be provided.
  • Volunteer at the after-party to say thank you to all of our wonderful Clean Sweep cleanup volunteers!
  • Be a photographer and help us capture the event for us by volunteering as a site or party photographer!
For volunteer and cleanup site registration questions email or call 512-391-0617 x 905.
VOLUNTEER PARTY and ENVIRONMENTAL FAIR
Saturday, April 13th  |  11:00 AM – 1:30 PM
Fiesta Gardens, 2100 Jesse E. Segovia St.
Directions, Bus Routes, and Parking Info
For volunteer party questions email or call 512.391.0622.